{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
{{facet.count}}
Search results for "EMA EPAR|DISEASES|MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES|RHEUMATIC DISEASES" in comments (approximate match)
Status:
US Approved Rx
(1998)
Source:
BLA103795
(1998)
Source URL:
First approved in 1998
Source:
BLA103795
Source URL:
Class:
PROTEIN
Status:
US Approved Rx
(2020)
Source:
BLA761140
(2020)
Source URL:
First approved in 1997
Source:
BLA103705
Source URL:
Class:
PROTEIN
Status:
US Approved Rx
(2020)
Source:
NDA213082
(2020)
Source URL:
First approved in 2012
Source:
NDA203214
Source URL:
Class (Stereo):
CHEMICAL (ABSOLUTE)
Conditions:
Tofacitinib is an orally available inhibitor of Janus kinases (JAK), with immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory activities. Upon administration, tofacitinib binds to JAK and prevents the activation of the JAK-signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway. This may decrease the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-6, -7, -15, -21, interferon-alpha and -beta, and may prevent both an inflammatory response and the inflammation-induced damage caused by certain immunological diseases. JAK kinases are intracellular enzymes involved in signaling pathways affecting hematopoiesis, immunity and inflammation. Tofacitinib was discovered and developed by the National Institutes of Health and Pfizer. Besides rheumatoid arthritis, tofacitinib has also been studied in clinical trials for the prevention of organ transplant rejection, and the treatment of psoriasis and ulcerative colitis. Patients treated with tofacitinib (XELJANZ) are at increased risk for developing serious infections that may lead to hospitalization or death and adverse reactions. Most patients who developed these infections were taking concomitant immunosuppressants such as methotrexate or corticosteroids.
Status:
US Approved Rx
(2019)
Source:
ANDA212453
(2019)
Source URL:
First approved in 1998
Source:
NDA020905
Source URL:
Class (Stereo):
CHEMICAL (ACHIRAL)
Teriflunomide (trade name Aubagio, marketed by Sanofi) is the active metabolite of leflunomide and it acts as an immunomodulatory agent by inhibiting pyrimidine synthesis by blocking the enzyme dihydroorotate dehydrogenase. Teriflunomide was investigated in the Phase III clinical trial TEMSO as a medication for multiple sclerosis (MS). The drug was approved by the FDA on September 13, 2012 and in the European Union on August 26, 2013. It is uncertain whether this explains its effect on MS lesions. Teriflunomide inhibits rapidly dividing cells, including activated T cells, which are thought to drive the disease process in MS. Teriflunomide may decrease the risk of infections compared to chemotherapy-like drugs because of its more-limited effects on the immune system. It has been found that teriflunomide blocks the transcription factor NF-κB. It also inhibits tyrosine kinase enzymes, but only in high doses not clinically used.
Status:
US Previously Marketed
Source:
BEXTRA by GD SEARLE
(2001)
Source URL:
First approved in 2001
Source:
BEXTRA by GD SEARLE
Source URL:
Class (Stereo):
CHEMICAL (ACHIRAL)
Valdecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, is classified as a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). Valdecoxib was manufactured and marketed under the brand name Bextra. Bextra was indicated for relief of the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis and adult rheumatoid arthritis. For the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea. But in 2005 FDA requested that Pfizer withdraw Bextra from the American market, because the Agency had concluded that the overall risk versus benefit profile of Bextra was unfavorable. That conclusion was based on the potential increased risk for serious cardiovascular (CV) adverse events, an increased risk of serious skin reactions (e.g., toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, erythema multiforme) compared to other NSAIDs, and the fact that Bextra had not been shown to offer any unique advantages over the other available NSAIDs.